|
Post by truedodger on Nov 15, 2019 18:22:10 GMT
Yes, I know about all that. I'm not arguing. Yes, they used it during the regular season. But we don't know how often. I don't think they were stupid enough to get caught in the moment. For example, it wouldn't make sense to use it against the crappy teams like the White Sox or Tigers and get caught when it was totally unnecessary. Against the good teams totally though. I'm sure someone will talk and we'll see. According to the videos they did it a lot during the regular season. You should check them out. And they did it against crappy teams too. I saw video against the White Sox so you're dead wrong about that. I also saw some against the A's and Mariners who finished last and 4th in their division. Also I remember I saw some against Toronto who also sucked. So much for that theory. smh... everything has to be a debate with you. Why not look at the videos instead of just making it up as you go? You're wrong I have seen them. It only makes sense that they have to test their methods so that would explain that. I will wait to see the actual results of the investigation before attempting to decipher anything on my own since we all have limited knowledge of the situation. But yeah ooookay LOL. Carry on and have a good day.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 15, 2019 19:11:35 GMT
@bnightengale
The #MLB minimum salary for 2020 will be $563,500, an $8,500 raise from the $555,000 minimum in 2019.
|
|
|
Post by 88bulldog on Nov 15, 2019 19:22:55 GMT
According to the videos they did it a lot during the regular season. You should check them out. And they did it against crappy teams too. I saw video against the White Sox so you're dead wrong about that. I also saw some against the A's and Mariners who finished last and 4th in their division. Also I remember I saw some against Toronto who also sucked. So much for that theory. smh... everything has to be a debate with you. Why not look at the videos instead of just making it up as you go? You're wrong I have seen them. It only makes sense that they have to test their methods so that would explain that. I will wait to see the actual results of the investigation before attempting to decipher anything on my own since we all have limited knowledge of the situation. But yeah ooookay LOL. Carry on and have a good day. You first said that that they wouldn’t do it against crappy teams like the white Sox. Once you were proven wrong you claim they were “testing their methods” against the bad teams. That’s hilarious. You also said you saw the videos. I don’t think you did, if you had seen them you wouldn’t make dumb statements claiming they wouldn’t do it against the crappy teams. The videos show differently. We also have plenty of knowledge of the situation right now. There are dozens of videos showing exactly what happened. They cheated against good teams, average teams and bad teams. That is fact.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 15, 2019 19:40:08 GMT
You're wrong I have seen them. It only makes sense that they have to test their methods so that would explain that. I will wait to see the actual results of the investigation before attempting to decipher anything on my own since we all have limited knowledge of the situation. But yeah ooookay LOL. Carry on and have a good day. You first said that that they wouldn’t do it against crappy teams like the white Sox. Once you were proven wrong you claim they were “testing their methods” against the bad teams. That’s hilarious. You also said you saw the videos. I don’t think you did, if you had seen them you wouldn’t make dumb statements claiming they wouldn’t do it against the crappy teams. The videos show differently. We also have plenty of knowledge of the situation right now. There are dozens of videos showing exactly what happened. They cheated against good teams, average teams and bad teams. That is fact. Of course they have to test their methods. That doesn't mean they will employ it on the crappy teams all the time. For what? To guarantee getting caught. Like always you are looking for a dumb argument because you don't know crap. All you have is speculation. The smart person in this instance would wait to see the results of the investigation before making conclusions. Anyway, you are wrong, prove your claim to us that I haven't seen the videos. LOL, carry on.
|
|
|
Post by 88bulldog on Nov 15, 2019 19:42:37 GMT
Took a quick look at a few videos. The cheating spans from early April through the playoffs. The teams I saw quickly were white Sox, Yankees (regular and post season), Mariners, Mets, Red Sox, Blue Jays, Royals and Dodgers (World Series). These teams span from the bottom of the barrel to the best in the league.
We may not know everything there is to know right now but we sure do know a lot. I’m sure more videos will surface as well.
|
|
|
Post by 88bulldog on Nov 15, 2019 19:48:02 GMT
You first said that that they wouldn’t do it against crappy teams like the white Sox. Once you were proven wrong you claim they were “testing their methods” against the bad teams. That’s hilarious. You also said you saw the videos. I don’t think you did, if you had seen them you wouldn’t make dumb statements claiming they wouldn’t do it against the crappy teams. The videos show differently. We also have plenty of knowledge of the situation right now. There are dozens of videos showing exactly what happened. They cheated against good teams, average teams and bad teams. That is fact. Of course they have to test their methods. That doesn't mean they will employ it on the crappy teams all the time. For what? To guarantee getting caught. Like always you are looking for a dumb argument because you don't know crap. All you have is speculation. The smart person in this instance would wait to see the results of the investigation before making conclusions. Anyway, you are wrong, prove your claim to us that I haven't seen the videos. LOL, carry on. Huh? I haven’t speculated at all. You have. I reported what was in the videos. you speculated that they wouldn’t do it against crappy teams like the white Sox. Proven 100% wrong. Then you speculated that they were just “testing their methods” against the bad teams. How would you possibly know that? You wouldn’t, you’re speculating.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 15, 2019 19:48:09 GMT
Took a quick look at a few videos. The cheating spans from early April through the playoffs. The teams I saw quickly were white Sox, Yankees (regular and post season), Mariners, Mets, Red Sox, Blue Jays, Royals and Dodgers (World Series). These teams span from the bottom of the barrel to the best in the league. We may not know everything there is to know right now but we sure do know a lot. I’m sure more videos will surface as well. It'd be good if we could see the video that you are talking about.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 15, 2019 19:49:39 GMT
Of course they have to test their methods. That doesn't mean they will employ it on the crappy teams all the time. For what? To guarantee getting caught. Like always you are looking for a dumb argument because you don't know crap. All you have is speculation. The smart person in this instance would wait to see the results of the investigation before making conclusions. Anyway, you are wrong, prove your claim to us that I haven't seen the videos. LOL, carry on. Huh? I haven’t speculated at all. You have. I reported what was in the videos. you speculated that they wouldn’t do it against crappy teams like the white Sox. Proven 100% wrong. Then you speculated that they were just “testing their methods” against the bad teams. How would you possibly know that? You wouldn’t, you’re speculating. Yes, it's all speculation on your part and mine. That's why I am saying "might" and want to wait until the detailed results of the investigation are known.
|
|
|
Post by 88bulldog on Nov 15, 2019 19:51:44 GMT
Yes, I know about all that. I'm not arguing. Yes, they used it during the regular season. But we don't know how often. I don't think they were stupid enough to get caught in the moment. For example, it wouldn't make sense to use it against the crappy teams like the White Sox or Tigers and get caught when it was totally unnecessary. Against the good teams totally though. I'm sure someone will talk and we'll see. Classic shit here. Lmao. Guy is truly a buffoon.
|
|
|
Post by 88bulldog on Nov 15, 2019 19:54:41 GMT
Huh? I haven’t speculated at all. You have. I reported what was in the videos. you speculated that they wouldn’t do it against crappy teams like the white Sox. Proven 100% wrong. Then you speculated that they were just “testing their methods” against the bad teams. How would you possibly know that? You wouldn’t, you’re speculating. Yes, it's all speculation on your part and mine. That's why I am saying "might" and want to wait until the detailed results of the investigation are known. Wrong. I haven’t speculated at all. I reported what was in the videos. YOU are speculating. And where did you use the word “might”? You said they wouldn’t do it against crappy teams. Yet they did. You must have seen it in the videos you supposedly watched first.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 15, 2019 20:01:48 GMT
Yes, I know about all that. I'm not arguing. Yes, they used it during the regular season. But we don't know how often. I don't think they were stupid enough to get caught in the moment. For example, it wouldn't make sense to use it against the crappy teams like the White Sox or Tigers and get caught when it was totally unnecessary. Against the good teams totally though. I'm sure someone will talk and we'll see. Classic shit here. Lmao. Guy is truly a buffoon. Why can't you discuss something without insults when someone is making a valid point against your claims. That's the reason why you ran posters off this board. Everyone is cool with billynono and jr etc. I don't get why you have to be an asshole and initiate insults. Show me where I initiated insults towards you on this topic? Please. Anyway, I said, "I don't think" and "it wouldn't make sense". Where did I say, I know or there is evidence? I'll gladly wait for the results of the investigation. You should also.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 15, 2019 20:03:05 GMT
Yes, it's all speculation on your part and mine. That's why I am saying "might" and want to wait until the detailed results of the investigation are known. Wrong. I haven’t speculated at all. I reported what was in the videos. YOU are speculating. And where did you use the word “might”? You said they wouldn’t do it against crappy teams. Yet they did. You must have seen it in the videos you supposedly watched first. Speculation. Please, show us the video that you are referencing. It might help.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 15, 2019 20:06:26 GMT
@mlbtraderumors
Cubs Have Initiated Extension Talks With Javier Baez
|
|
|
Post by 88bulldog on Nov 15, 2019 22:13:40 GMT
Classic shit here. Lmao. Guy is truly a buffoon. Why can't you discuss something without insults when someone is making a valid point against your claims. That's the reason why you ran posters off this board. Everyone is cool with billynono and jr etc. I don't get why you have to be an asshole and initiate insults. Show me where I initiated insults towards you on this topic? Please. Anyway, I said, "I don't think" and "it wouldn't make sense". Where did I say, I know or there is evidence? I'll gladly wait for the results of the investigation. You should also. I called you a buffoon because that’s how you act sometimes. That’s the perfect word to describe you. you didn’t use the phrases “I don’t think”, you were matter of fact that they wouldn’t do it against crap teams. Once proven wrong you should just respond by saying something like “my bad” or “I didn’t realize that”. Try that some time, it makes for better discussion. there are videos all over YouTube. Check them out, I shouldn’t need to post the link here for you. You will see all the teams I mentioned, as early as the Royals I believe on April 9, 2017 all the way through their last home game which was Game 5 of the World Series. Gurriel got tipped by whistling when the score was 4-1 and took Kershaw deep for a 3 run homer. You will also see game 3 footage where Yu gives up a homer early on before he got knocked out.
|
|
|
Post by Blunashun on Nov 16, 2019 2:12:02 GMT
I'm gonna have to close it. At least temporarily. Please bring it back on topic.
|
|