|
Post by truedodger on Nov 1, 2019 15:50:33 GMT
Some obvious and interesting names in there.
Adam Jones- As a RH bat off the bench in place of Freese.
Jose Abreu- A RH bat but highly unlikely when Muncy plays there, JT can move over, and Edwin Rios is coming.
Zack Wheeler- RH pitcher, throws hard, has shown productivity and will be only 30 next year.
Dellin Bentances- Can definitely help the pen if he can heal from the Achilles injury.
Will Smith- LH reliever can definitely help the pen.
And, of course, the obvious, Cole and Rendon.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 1, 2019 15:55:53 GMT
Dodgers: It’s too soon for the Dodgers to give up on A.J. Pollock
by Michael Wittman
A.J. Pollock had an interesting first season for the Dodgers that ended with a disappointing postseason performance. His second half was strong. In January, the Dodgers made their big outfield free-agent signing although it wasn’t Bryce Harper. Instead, the club signed A.J. Pollock way from the Arizona Diamondbacks to a five year $60 million dollar deal that is really a four year $50 million dollar deal as the fifth year is likely going to be bought out. A.J. Pollock has the reputation for being an injury prone player but the reason he missed a good chunk of the 2019 season was due in part to bad luck as he had an elbow infection. The infection was so severe that he had to undergo a procedure to remove metal plates in his elbow from a previous operation.
Although he had a strong second half, most Dodger fans will remember his 2019 season as the awful showing he had in the NLDS. Pollock went 0-13 with 11 strikeouts against the Nationals and was benched after appearing lost at the plate. While he did struggle mightily in the NLDS, the same could be said for most of the Dodger lineup including Cody Bellinger and Corey Seager. While many fans have started putting together hypothetical trade packages to unload A.J. Pollock, the Dodgers are unlikely to give up on A.J. yet nor should they. His contract is not great but from a luxury tax standpoint that takes the average annual salary, Pollock accounts for $12 million dollars next season. A salary that will not hurt the team too much if he struggles in a full-time role.
After returning from his elbow infection, Pollock put together a strong second half of the season as he slashed .288/.348/.537 with 13 home runs. He played like the player that the Dodgers thought they were getting when they inked him during the Harper derby. The one significant decline came defensively where Pollock is now a left-fielder and cannot play center like he once could.
Overall, A.J. Pollock had a much better season against left-handed pitching. He put together a .323/.370/.535 slash line against southpaws compared to a .239/.308/.435 line against right-handed pitching. Despite the mediocre line against righties, A.J. did hit nine home runs off righties and was much better against them in his strong second half.
From the first game after the all-star break on until the end of the regular season, Pollock slashed .272/.342/.515 against right-handed pitching with eight of those nine home runs. The second half showed that there is plenty of life left in Pollock’s bat. For the 2020 season, A.J. figures to battle Alex Verdugo and Joc Pederson for starts in left field. It wouldn’t be surprising if Pollock gets the starting left fielder role and Alex Verdugo starts in right with Joc Pederson fighting for playing time or getting traded elsewhere. At the very minimum, Pollock will help mash lefties in 2020 and if he performs like he did in the second half of the season then he will put up very nice numbers next season.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 1, 2019 16:14:27 GMT
Dodgers: It’s too soon for the Dodgers to give up on A.J. Pollock Yeah, totally, AJ was unlucky. An elbow infection that needed a procedure for a previous surgery. I am not giving up on this guy either. He was a player in AZ. He may not be a Center Fielder anymore but we've seen guys demoted and benched (Puig/Bellinger/Joc/Grandal) and they come back with something to prove. I think he will be a big performer next year for the team.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 1, 2019 17:10:56 GMT
Is trading Clayton Kershaw feasible?
He has $31 mil per year for the next two years for $62 mil total.
Would the Dodgers do it? What would it take? What would the team need to attach? How much money would the team need to eat? etc.
We know we can't trust him to pitch in post- season. It takes him a couple of innings to figure out his stuff. And, we should as heck don't want him pitching in relief in post- season as well.
|
|
jrgreene6
Legend
Married . . . With Cats
Posts: 7,438
|
Post by jrgreene6 on Nov 1, 2019 21:20:55 GMT
Dodgers: It’s too soon for the Dodgers to give up on A.J. Pollock Yeah, totally, AJ was unlucky. An elbow infection that needed a procedure for a previous surgery. I am not giving up on this guy either. He was a player in AZ. He may not be a Center Fielder anymore but we've seen guys demoted and benched (Puig/Bellinger/Joc/Grandal) and they come back with something to prove. I think he will be a big performer next year for the team. I don’t think luck, good or bad has anything to do with AJ. He just seems to be one of those players that somehow spends half the year on the IL nearly every season. It’s unfortunate, but we knew that going in and still signed him. What’s scary is Seager is starting to show those same tendencies this early in his career. It’ll be interesting to see if both or either of them is in blue in Glendale this spring. GO DODGERS!!!
|
|
jrgreene6
Legend
Married . . . With Cats
Posts: 7,438
|
Post by jrgreene6 on Nov 1, 2019 21:32:46 GMT
Is trading Clayton Kershaw feasible? He has $31 mil per year for the next two years for $62 mil total. Would the Dodgers do it? What would it take? What would the team need to attach? How much money would the team need to eat? etc. We know we can't trust him to pitch in post- season. It takes him a couple of innings to figure out his stuff. And, we should as heck don't want him pitching in relief in post- season as well. I don’t see this happening. He’ll likely be one of the few that spends his entire career in one uniform and will probably hang up the cleats at the end of this contract. He’s still a very good arm for our rotation, even with his diminishing MPH fastball. He needs to continue working on his off speed and curve and mixing of pitches that made Maddox so successful. His postseason appearances may need to be curtailed or eliminated by ownership because you and I both know there’s not a chance in the world DDF II is going to keep him off the roster or not use him. That kind of loyalty is admirable, but it cost us big time the last few years. And whatever brain freeze Kersh goes under in the postseason certainly isn’t going to go away anytime soon, especially after this years meltdown. GO DODGERS!!!
|
|
|
Post by Blunashun on Nov 2, 2019 1:19:28 GMT
I agree Kershaw stays right where he's at. The difficulty is in balancing regular season Clayton (who gets us into October) & postseason Kershaw (who has been a major saboteur once there).
I can totally see Roberts giving Clayton yet another start when the games really count, out of respect. Then the Dodgers may have to overcome his performance. What I would have trouble with is Clayton being our #1 or #2 starter. Under no circumstances (except maybe garbage time) should Kershaw come out of the pen.
You can't leave a first ballot Hall of Famer off the postseason roster. Fuck you, you cowering sycophant, David Vassegh, if you think anyone is suggesting that by rehashing the pitch tipping theory. Who do you brown-nose in our elongated aftermath?
|
|
jrgreene6
Legend
Married . . . With Cats
Posts: 7,438
|
Post by jrgreene6 on Nov 2, 2019 2:11:24 GMT
I agree Kershaw stays right where he's at. The difficulty is in balancing regular season Clayton (who gets us into October) & postseason Kershaw (who has been a major saboteur once there). I can totally see Roberts giving Clayton yet another start when the games really count, out of respect. Then the Dodgers may have to overcome his performance. What I would have trouble with is Clayton being our #1 or #2 starter. Under no circumstances (except maybe garbage time) should Kershaw come out of the pen. You can't leave a first ballot Hall of Famer off the postseason roster. Fuck you, you cowering sycophant, David Vassegh, if you think anyone is suggesting that by rehashing the pitch tipping theory. Who do you brown-nose in our elongated aftermath? I think Kersh out of the pen works for a “ specialty out” like he got against the Nats. Or in mop-up duty, as suggested. He is third or fourth starter in the postseason at this point and if by some miracle we land Cole, DEFINITELY number four. I put Ferris, Cole and May / Goose before Kersh. Sorry - but he’s just too volatile and untrustworthy come October. It’s not a hunch - it’s become a fact. The dude is a complete zero, much as I hate to say it. GO DODGERS!!!
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 2, 2019 13:09:38 GMT
Yeah, totally, AJ was unlucky. An elbow infection that needed a procedure for a previous surgery. I am not giving up on this guy either. He was a player in AZ. He may not be a Center Fielder anymore but we've seen guys demoted and benched (Puig/Bellinger/Joc/Grandal) and they come back with something to prove. I think he will be a big performer next year for the team. I don’t think luck, good or bad has anything to do with AJ. He just seems to be one of those players that somehow spends half the year on the IL nearly every season. It’s unfortunate, but we knew that going in and still signed him. What’s scary is Seager is starting to show those same tendencies this early in his career. It’ll be interesting to see if both or either of them is in blue in Glendale this spring. GO DODGERS!!! He has spent a lot of time on the IL no doubt. But, I guess it can be said that he gets injured because he plays hard. I remember a few years ago he got hurt sliding head first at home plate. This past year an elbow infection? Who the hell ever hears about an elbow infection. And, sure enough it needed surgery because of a previous surgery that had gone bad. Just lousy luck. I'll stay in his corner because I've seen what he can do. If he gets breaks here and there like they have done with JT he might stay healthy and regain his productivity for the whole year next year. His second half wasn't bad this past year.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 2, 2019 13:17:04 GMT
Is trading Clayton Kershaw feasible? He has $31 mil per year for the next two years for $62 mil total. Would the Dodgers do it? What would it take? What would the team need to attach? How much money would the team need to eat? etc. We know we can't trust him to pitch in post- season. It takes him a couple of innings to figure out his stuff. And, we should as heck don't want him pitching in relief in post- season as well. I don’t see this happening. He’ll likely be one of the few that spends his entire career in one uniform and will probably hang up the cleats at the end of this contract. He’s still a very good arm for our rotation, even with his diminishing MPH fastball. He needs to continue working on his off speed and curve and mixing of pitches that made Maddox so successful. His postseason appearances may need to be curtailed or eliminated by ownership because you and I both know there’s not a chance in the world DDF II is going to keep him off the roster or not use him. That kind of loyalty is admirable, but it cost us big time the last few years. And whatever brain freeze Kersh goes under in the postseason certainly isn’t going to go away anytime soon, especially after this years meltdown. GO DODGERS!!! Yeah, sure seems like they'll let the contract run out and bid him farewell in grand fashion. That's admirable on their part, no question. However, if he is #1- 3 next year in post-season we're in big trouble. He should only be allowed to stress us out in a game #4 and that's it and under no circumstances relieving whatsoever. We've seen that we'll need stud starters that can actually be productive as relievers as well and that is definitely not Kershaw anymore and or Ryu or Hill.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 2, 2019 13:30:23 GMT
I agree Kershaw stays right where he's at. The difficulty is in balancing regular season Clayton (who gets us into October) & postseason Kershaw (who has been a major saboteur once there). I can totally see Roberts giving Clayton yet another start when the games really count, out of respect. Then the Dodgers may have to overcome his performance. What I would have trouble with is Clayton being our #1 or #2 starter. Under no circumstances (except maybe garbage time) should Kershaw come out of the pen. You can't leave a first ballot Hall of Famer off the postseason roster. Fuck you, you cowering sycophant, David Vassegh, if you think anyone is suggesting that by rehashing the pitch tipping theory. Who do you brown-nose in our elongated aftermath? I think Kersh out of the pen works for a “ specialty out” like he got against the Nats. Or in mop-up duty, as suggested. He is third or fourth starter in the postseason at this point and if by some miracle we land Cole, DEFINITELY number four. I put Ferris, Cole and May / Goose before Kersh. Sorry - but he’s just too volatile and untrustworthy come October. It’s not a hunch - it’s become a fact. The dude is a complete zero, much as I hate to say it. GO DODGERS!!! I posted about this in my prior post. No way ever more in relief and if we must let him keep us on the edge of our seats only for a game #4.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 2, 2019 13:33:30 GMT
I agree Kershaw stays right where he's at. The difficulty is in balancing regular season Clayton (who gets us into October) & postseason Kershaw (who has been a major saboteur once there). I can totally see Roberts giving Clayton yet another start when the games really count, out of respect. Then the Dodgers may have to overcome his performance. What I would have trouble with is Clayton being our #1 or #2 starter. Under no circumstances (except maybe garbage time) should Kershaw come out of the pen. You can't leave a first ballot Hall of Famer off the postseason roster. Fuck you, you cowering sycophant, David Vassegh, if you think anyone is suggesting that by rehashing the pitch tipping theory. Who do you brown-nose in our elongated aftermath? He should be fine pitching against the Rockies, Padres and Giants. But, yeah, guy is a bust in post-season.
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 2, 2019 13:44:24 GMT
Dodgers: Free Agent Gerrit Cole Clarifies Stance on Playing for West Coast Team
Cole made some comments after the World Series loss to the Nationals.
by Daniel Preciado
The off-season prior to the 2019 season was headlined by Manny Machado and Bryce Harper whom inevitably signed with the San Diego Padres and Philadelphia Phillies respectively. This off-season, it will be Anthony Rendon and Gerrit Cole.
In a recent column, Cole’s quotes regarding his impending free agency were analyzed.
Recent rumors have linked the Dodgers to both superstar free agents, but it appears that the Dodgers might not be of any preference to Gerrit Cole, despite his Los Angeles roots. Cole’s comments after the Houston Astros’ World Series loss to the Washington Nationals made it seem as if he wanted to return to Houston and that if he didn’t, he would keep his options open. At the end of the day, Gerrit Cole will probably be pitching for the highest bidder in 2020 because of his agent — the infamous Scott Boras.
Cole started the post-game media scrum with the following questionable statement:
“I’m not an employee of the team. I’m doing this interview as a representative of myself, I guess.”
Everyone immediately jumped on the comments as they took them to mean that he wanted out of Houston. He later clarified that his comments were made purely out to frustration:
“I was upset and my tone did not come off quite the way I wanted it to. One win away. We had the lead with eight outs to go. It’s just a tough pill to swallow. Those comments were intended to be lighthearted, but also truthful in the sense that I don’t want to be talking about free agency and I don’t want to be addressing those comments 20 minutes after a team loss.”
Former Dodger Josh Reddick also made a comment regarding Cole’s future and predicted that he would be heading west:
“He probably wants to be closer to home. It’s definitely going to be west of Nevada.”
This was Cole’s response:
“No, that’s not a fair assumption. I never said that.”
Do not get your hopes up, Dodger fans. Gerrit Cole might simply return to Houston if they match the price Cole and Boras desire.
|
|
jrgreene6
Legend
Married . . . With Cats
Posts: 7,438
|
Post by jrgreene6 on Nov 2, 2019 16:38:56 GMT
Dodgers: Free Agent Gerrit Cole Clarifies Stance on Playing for West Coast Team Cole made some comments after the World Series loss to the Nationals. by Daniel Preciado The off-season prior to the 2019 season was headlined by Manny Machado and Bryce Harper whom inevitably signed with the San Diego Padres and Philadelphia Phillies respectively. This off-season, it will be Anthony Rendon and Gerrit Cole. In a recent column, Cole’s quotes regarding his impending free agency were analyzed. Recent rumors have linked the Dodgers to both superstar free agents, but it appears that the Dodgers might not be of any preference to Gerrit Cole, despite his Los Angeles roots. Cole’s comments after the Houston Astros’ World Series loss to the Washington Nationals made it seem as if he wanted to return to Houston and that if he didn’t, he would keep his options open. At the end of the day, Gerrit Cole will probably be pitching for the highest bidder in 2020 because of his agent — the infamous Scott Boras. Cole started the post-game media scrum with the following questionable statement: “I’m not an employee of the team. I’m doing this interview as a representative of myself, I guess.” Everyone immediately jumped on the comments as they took them to mean that he wanted out of Houston. He later clarified that his comments were made purely out to frustration: “I was upset and my tone did not come off quite the way I wanted it to. One win away. We had the lead with eight outs to go. It’s just a tough pill to swallow. Those comments were intended to be lighthearted, but also truthful in the sense that I don’t want to be talking about free agency and I don’t want to be addressing those comments 20 minutes after a team loss.” Former Dodger Josh Reddick also made a comment regarding Cole’s future and predicted that he would be heading west: “He probably wants to be closer to home. It’s definitely going to be west of Nevada.” This was Cole’s response: “No, that’s not a fair assumption. I never said that.” Do not get your hopes up, Dodger fans. Gerrit Cole might simply return to Houston if they match the price Cole and Boras desire. There was never a doubt in my mind about us NOT signing Cole. This ownership has made it all too clear that they’re not going to pay top dollars and / or get tied into any lengthy contracts. All one has to do is look at their previous transactions - dumping large albatrosses like Kemp, Puig and Bailey (even though they’ll end up paying him $30 mil to play for the Royals). Their big signings last year of Kelly & Pollock resulted in our earliest postseason exit over the last several years. Cole will likely be looking for his final contract of at least five to seven years at $30 - $35 mil plus annually. Anybody that thinks LA is going to pony up that kind of contract clearly hasn’t been watching this current ownership group. GO DODGERS!!!
|
|
|
Post by truedodger on Nov 2, 2019 17:18:47 GMT
Dodgers: Free Agent Gerrit Cole Clarifies Stance on Playing for West Coast Team There was never a doubt in my mind about us NOT signing Cole. This ownership has made it all too clear that they’re not going to pay top dollars and / or get tied into any lengthy contracts. All one has to do is look at their previous transactions - dumping large albatrosses like Kemp, Puig and Bailey (even though they’ll end up paying him $30 mil to play for the Royals). Their big signings last year of Kelly & Pollock resulted in our earliest postseason exit over the last several years. Cole will likely be looking for his final contract of at least five to seven years at $30 - $35 mil plus annually. Anybody that thinks LA is going to pony up that kind of contract clearly hasn’t been watching this current ownership group. GO DODGERS!!! Yeah, I wished for Cole or Strasburg, but knew from the go that Cole would go to the highest bidder and that ain't the Dodgers. Same with Strasburg. I've heard the Angels might go after Cole. I think our focus should be on a guy like Wheeler via free agency. But, it's thought that the Mets will give him the qualifying offer and he'll reject it therefore attaching a pick if he signs. That can complicate things. Another option is via trade probably towards the deadline for a guy like Syndergaard but we know that that will take precious controllable prospects which Friedman and Kasten covet. It seems like the Dodgers are going to have to go against something they don't like doing if they want to obtain an arm, whether it be big money, draft pick(s), or prospects. Wheeler 96.7 mph on his FB Syndergaard 97.7 mph on his FB Kluber 91.6 mph on his FB
|
|